Case 3200964/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr E Stevens (2) Mr W Mamenero v Clann Restoration Limited and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200964/2022
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
(1) Mr E Stevens (2) Mr W Mamenero
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the first respondent had made unauthorised deductions from each claimant's wages. It ordered the first respondent to pay £1,176 to Mr Stevens and £1,302 to Mr Mamenero.
It also found that the first respondent had failed to provide itemized payslips, contrary to section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996, and had failed to provide each claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment, contrary to section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. For each section 1 breach, the tribunal ordered payment of £2,520, described in the judgment as four weeks' pay.
The tribunal made no award for failure to follow the ACAS Code, because no relevant code was identified as applying to these claims. It also recorded that all claims brought against the second and third respondents were dismissed on withdrawal, and the hearing listed for 31 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,176 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,302 |
| Other | Breach of section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide itemized payslips to both claimants. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Breach of section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment to the first claimant. | Upheld | — | £2,520 |
| Other | Breach of section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment to the second claimant. | Upheld | — | £2,520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,518
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.