Case 3200966/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Valentin Todorov v Apex Logistics Solutions Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200966/2020
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Valentin Todorov
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningValentin Todorov was employed by Apex Logistics Solutions Ltd from 23 February 2019 to 26 February 2020 on a gross salary of £30,000 paid monthly. He was denied access to the respondent's premises on 6 February 2020 but continued to work with David Perry, a director of the respondent, and was told he would be paid for that work. On 26 February 2020 the respondent did not pay his February salary of £2,500 gross, and he treated himself as dismissed. The respondent later issued a P45 dated 4 March 2020 showing a last day of employment of 29 February 2020.
The claimant presented claims on 6 April 2020 for unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, notice pay and unpaid wages. At a preliminary hearing on 22 November 2021, Employment Judge Barrett struck out the unfair dismissal and redundancy claims because of length of service. At the final hearing, the tribunal considered the respondent's liquidation and decided it was fair and in the interests of justice to proceed, noting that the ET1 had been sent to the liquidators and that the respondent had not engaged with the proceedings.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and had breached the contract by failing to give one month's notice. It ordered payment of £1,994.68 gross for unpaid wages and £2,500 gross for notice pay. The judgment states that both awards were expressed as gross figures and may be subject to deductions for income tax and national insurance if required.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by Employment Judge Barrett on 22 November 2021 because the claimant did not have sufficient length of service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out by Employment Judge Barrett on 22 November 2021 because the claimant did not have sufficient length of service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's February 2020 wages and that this was an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,995 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract because he was not given the one month's contractual notice; damages of £2,500 gross were awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,495
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.