Case 3200969/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Birgiolaite v Time Wholesale Services (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200969/2020
- Decision date
- 19 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms Anna Berry, Ms J Clarke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Birgiolaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 17, 18 and 19 August 2021 before Employment Judge Crosfill, with lay members Ms Anna Berry and Ms J Clarke. The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's unfair dismissal claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996, stating that it was not well founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the Claimant's discrimination claims brought under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. The extracted judgment does not set out further reasoning beyond the formal dismissal of those claims.
The Claimant's notice pay claim, brought under the Employment Tribunal Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996; judgment states it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Judgment states that the Claimant's discrimination claims brought under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim brought under the Employment Tribunal Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.