Case 3200969/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms D Vosper (2) Ms S Sykes v Bellway Homes Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200969/2022
- Decision date
- 11 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms D Vosper (2) Ms S Sykes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Vosper and Ms S Sykes brought claims against Bellway Homes Limited; their cases were heard together at the East London Hearing Centre over four days in July 2025 before Employment Judge Byrne sitting alone.
The Tribunal dismissed the direct sex discrimination claim brought by Ms Vosper. The unpaid wages claims brought by both claimants were well-founded and upheld; however, the respondent had already paid the relevant wages on 29 July 2024 — £901.25 net (£1,135.23 gross) to Ms Vosper and £257.18 gross to Ms Sykes — so no further monetary awards arose.
Written reasons were not provided as oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim brought by Ms D Vosper not upheld and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages claims upheld for both claimants. Respondent had already paid £901.25 net (£1,135.23 gross) to Ms Vosper and £257.18 gross to Ms Sykes on 29 July 2024, so no further awards arise. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.