Case 3200971/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr I Perkins v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2023

Case reference: 3200971/2023
Decision date: 22 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr I Perkins

Respondent

East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal considered whether the complaints of race discrimination, sex discrimination and unfair dismissal should be struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 as having no reasonable prospects of success due to the operation of statutory time limits.

The judgment records that those complaints were not struck out. The one-page judgment does not decide the merits of the complaints and does not address any remedy or monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the race discrimination complaint was not struck out under Rule 37 as having no reasonable prospects of success due to statutory time limits; it does not determine the merits.	Other	Race	—
Sex discrimination	The judgment states that the sex discrimination complaint was not struck out under Rule 37 as having no reasonable prospects of success due to statutory time limits; it does not determine the merits.	Other	Sex	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint was not struck out under Rule 37 as having no reasonable prospects of success due to statutory time limits; it does not determine the merits.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.