Case 3200978/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Birch v HSBC Bank plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200978/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Birch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant resigned on 3 October 2019, with employment ending on 1 November 2019. The parties agreed that, after Early Conciliation, the time limit for presenting the unfair dismissal complaint expired on 21 March 2020. The claim was presented on 9 April 2020, so the tribunal considered whether it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time.
The tribunal found that the Claimant knew there was a time limit and initially understood from ACAS that the time limit clock was paused during Early Conciliation. However, after receiving the ACAS certificate and covering email on 21 February 2020, it was not reasonable for her to continue relying on that earlier understanding without making further enquiries. The tribunal found the email made clear that it was her responsibility to ensure any claim was submitted on time and that ACAS could not advise on the deadline.
The tribunal concluded that the Claimant had a month after receiving the certificate to seek information about the time limit, including from the ACAS website or other advice sources. It found that attempts to contact the conciliator, the ongoing grievance appeal, settlement hopes, and pandemic restrictions did not create a practical impediment to timely presentation. The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable to present the complaint by 21 March 2020 and therefore it had no jurisdiction to hear it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as a complaint of unfair constructive dismissal. It was dismissed because it was presented after the agreed time limit and the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- s.18A ETA 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Walls Meat Company v Khan
- Inchcape Retail Limited v Shelton
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Chief Constable of Lincolnshire v Caston
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.