Case 3200979/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Shala v Aldi StoresLtd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200979/2022
- Decision date
- 11 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Shala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 April 2023 at the East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge B Beyzade struck out the claimant's complaint of discrimination because of religion or belief under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that this complaint had no reasonable prospect of success.
The respondent's application dated 18 April 2023 to strike out the claimant's claims for non-compliance with tribunal orders, and on the basis that some claims had no reasonable prospect of success because of jurisdictional issues, was not granted. The judgment states that any jurisdictional issues in relation to the claimant's discrimination claims would be investigated and determined at the final hearing.
The claimant's application to amend her claims to include the claims set out in her amended Particulars of Claim of 09 June 2022 was refused, save that permission was given to amend to include a claim of direct race discrimination concerning the claimant's contention that she was suspended because of her race. The claimant's separate application to amend by reference to acts 2 and 4 of her Further Particulars of Claim of 14 March 2023 was also refused. No final remedy was awarded in this decision, and the tribunal noted that case management orders for the final hearing were issued separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | Permission was granted to amend the claim to include direct race discrimination in respect of the claimant's contention that she was suspended because of her race; the judgment records no merits determination. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.