Case 3200980/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Kucharski v Women Like Me International Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200980/2022
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Appearances
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Kucharski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London East Employment Tribunal on 26 August 2022, before Employment Judge Russell, the Respondent did not attend and the Claimant appeared in person. The tribunal recorded three successful money claims arising out of the employment relationship.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,502.92. It also found that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £750.
In addition, the tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £712.50, calculated as 9.5 days at £75 per day. The total sum awarded by the judgment was £3,965.42.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,503 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and awards 9.5 days at £75 per day. | Upheld | — | £713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,965
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.