Case 3200983/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H. Khan v Swissport GB Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200983/2023
- Decision date
- 27 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr M. Rowe, Mr J. Hutchings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H. Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person at the material time by reason of depression, anxiety and stress. It dismissed his claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. Remedy was not determined in this judgment, and a separate remedy hearing was directed to determine compensation, including consideration of Polkey and mitigation of loss.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant was a disabled person at the material time by reason of depression, anxiety and stress, but his failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed. No written reasons are provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only. Compensation was deferred to a remedy hearing, where Polkey and mitigation of loss were to be considered. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.