Case 3200991/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Okeke v Livingstone Health Care Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200991/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Okeke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Okeke worked for Livingstone Health Care Ltd as a Quality Monitoring Officer from 17 June 2019 until her resignation in February 2020. Her claims were for arrears of pay, holiday pay, mileage expenses, and additional payments for attending on a service user. The Respondent had deducted a total of ?650 from her final pay, leaving her with ?263.68 net, and the tribunal also recorded later adjustments and payments made after checking her January 2020 hours.
On the arrears of pay issue, the tribunal accepted the Respondent's evidence that the Claimant had been overpaid in December 2019. It held that the Respondent was entitled to deduct that overpayment from final pay under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also found that the Claimant had not proved she worked on 15 January 2020 or established any further unpaid wages, and it rejected her suggestion that the records had been manipulated.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the Claimant worked an average of 3.5 days per week and accrued 12.14 days of leave, rounded up to 13 days. It accepted that several absences had been treated as holiday by agreement so that she could be paid, and that she was paid for bank holidays as well. The tribunal held that she had been paid for all 13 days of holiday and dismissed the holiday pay claim, referring to regulations 14 and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The mileage claim was dismissed because the Claimant did not provide evidence to establish entitlement or to substantiate the amount claimed. The claim for additional payments for attending a service user was also dismissed: the tribunal found no contractual or statutory basis for double pay, and held that the attendance fell within the Claimant's role as Quality Monitoring Officer.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay / unpaid wages; tribunal accepted the Respondent's evidence of overpayment and found no further wages due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay; tribunal found the Claimant had accrued 13 days and had been paid for all 13 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for mileage expenses, valued by the Claimant at ?450; tribunal found no evidence to substantiate entitlement or the amount claimed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for additional payments in respect of attendance on a service user, valued by the Claimant at ?450; tribunal found no contractual or statutory basis for double pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
- regulations 14 and 16 WTR 1998
- Elizabeth Claire Care Management Ltd v Francis
- Revenue and Customs v Stringer
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.