Case 3200997/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Norman v LPW (Europe) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200997/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Norman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Lee Norman, brought a redundancy payment claim against LPW (Europe) Limited. Sitting at the East London Hearing Centre on 24 November 2020, Employment Judge B Elgot dismissed the claim. The judgment records that the claimant unreasonably refused an offer of immediate renewal of his contract of employment.
The tribunal found that the offer amounted to suitable employment in relation to the claimant for the purposes of section 141(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Because that statutory condition was met, the redundancy payment claim did not succeed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant unreasonably refused an offer of immediate renewal of his contract of employment, which was an offer of suitable employment within s.141(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.141(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.