Case 3201002/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Beal v KSP Chartered Surveyors Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201002/2023
- Decision date
- 23 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeny Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms G McLaughlin, Ms BK Sau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Beal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 23 November 2023 at East London Hearing Centre, before Employment Judge Feeny with members Ms G McLaughlin and Ms BK Sau, the tribunal determined that KSP Chartered Surveyors Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from Mrs L Beal’s wages. The judgment records the sum as £2,291.67 gross and directs that it be paid to the claimant net of deductions for tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s sex discrimination claim, stating that it was not well-founded. No further reasons, legal tests, or separate remedy findings are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £2,291.67 gross and ordered that it be paid net of deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,292 |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,292
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.