Case 3201005/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A. Fowler v Primos Care Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201005/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A. Fowler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 22 October 2024 before Employment Judge Massarella, the respondent did not attend. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Primos Care Limited and found that Mrs A. Fowler had been unfairly dismissed, wrongfully dismissed for failure to pay notice pay, and subjected to unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,035.20 for unfair dismissal and a compensatory award made up of past loss of earnings of £358.56, past loss of employer pension contributions of £29.40, future loss of earnings of £179.28, future loss of pension of £5.38, and loss of statutory rights of £300. It also awarded £2,007.12 for unpaid notice pay and £275.60 for accrued but untaken holiday pay.
The total payable was £5,190.54 without deductions of any sort.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award plus compensatory award components. | Upheld | — | £2,908 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Found wrongfully dismissed for failure to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,007 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay, described in the judgment as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £276 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,191
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,035
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £873
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.