Case 3201006/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Miss M Da Silva v London and Quadrant Housing Trust UPON APPLICATION made by email dated 3 September 2018 to reconsider the — 2018

Case reference: 3201006/2018
Decision date: 26 September 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Foxwell

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss M Da Silva

Respondent

London and Quadrant Housing Trust UPON APPLICATION made by email dated 3 September 2018 to reconsider the

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a reconsideration judgment dated 26 September 2018 in case 3201006/2018. The claimant was Miss M Da Silva and the respondent was London and Quadrant Housing Trust. The application to reconsider was made by email dated 3 September 2018, and the tribunal dealt with it without a hearing and by consent.

The tribunal stated that the earlier judgment under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, dated 1 August 2018, was revoked. It also stated that the response was accepted. The extract does not contain any findings on the underlying discrimination or unfair dismissal allegations themselves, nor does it record any compensation or other remedy.

Because the judgment only disposes of the reconsideration application and does not decide the substantive claims on their merits, there is no merits outcome or award recorded in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	On 26 September 2018 the tribunal, acting without a hearing and by consent, revoked the earlier judgment under rule 71. The text does not determine the substantive claims on their merits.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.