Case 3201023/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Cordery v Toys R US Limited In Administration — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201023/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Cordery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent company was in administration. The Tribunal recorded that neither the Administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 18 November 2020 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason, and the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not specify the substantive cause of action. It was struck out because proceedings against the respondent in administration lacked administrator consent or court permission and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being asked why the claim should not be struck out as not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.