Case 3201031/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Fofanah v Day Webster Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201031/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Fofanah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 1 May 2025 before Employment Judge S Shore, with no appearance by the claimant and Ms H Kilroy appearing for the respondent, the tribunal dealt with case 3201031/2024. The written judgment records that the claimant was Mr F Fofanah and the respondent was Day Webster Limited.
The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claims in their entirety. The stated reasons were that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success, that the claimant had failed actively to pursue the case, and that he had failed to comply with Tribunal orders. The judgment does not record any separate merits findings on the underlying claims and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately identify claim-level findings; it states that the claimant’s claims were struck out in their entirety. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify claim-level findings; it states that the claimant’s claims were struck out in their entirety. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.