Case 3201039/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Raymond Morrow v The Sugar Shop Sugaring Co. Limited Interested Party: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201039/2023
- Decision date
- 25 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Raymond Morrow
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 25 September 2023, Employment Judge Liz Ord held that Mr Raymond Morrow was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,873.85 gross. The respondent was ordered to pay that sum subject to tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,873.85 gross, ordered against the respondent subject to tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £7,874 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the holiday pay claim because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the notice pay claim because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,874
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.