Case 3201041/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Obele v Mr F. Mendes and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201041/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation For
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr S. Obele
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 17 December 2024 at East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge R Overton struck out the unfair dismissal claim presented in both case numbers, finding that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing.
In case 3201451/2024, the claims relating to dismissal and/or detriment relating to public interest disclosure were dismissed upon withdrawal. The disability discrimination claim was also dismissed upon withdrawal, as was the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented in both claims; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claims relating to dismissal and/or detriment relating to public interest disclosure in claim 3201451/2024 were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal in claim 3201451/2024. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal in claim 3201451/2024. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.