Case 3201043/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ian Cressall v Saxton 4X4 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201043/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ian Cressall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 January 2022, at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform, Employment Judge Fowell heard a preliminary issue in the claim brought by Mr Ian Cressall against Saxton 4x4 Limited. The tribunal found that the claim had been presented out of time.
Because the claim was out of time, it was dismissed at the preliminary stage and the tribunal did not go on to determine the substantive merits of the pleaded claims. The judgment does not record any liability findings on unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deductions, or working time issues.
The judgment also records that the employer's contract claim will proceed to a hearing on 28 June 2022, with case management orders attached for that hearing. No monetary award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a preliminary issue only: the claim was presented out of time and was dismissed. No substantive liability findings were made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.