Case 3201092/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L. Boyle v NHS North East London ICB — 2026
- Case reference
- 3201092/2023
- Decision date
- 13 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms J. Henry, Mr L. O'Callaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L. Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSitting at the East London Hearing Centre on 13 January 2026, Employment Judge Massarella with Ms J. Henry and Mr L. O'Callaghan handed down a remedy judgment in the claimant's previously successful victimisation claims against NHS North East London ICB. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Mr C. Hill of counsel.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £3,485.77 in respect of the failure to pay notice pay, £10,000 for injury to feelings, and £2,351.78 in interest. The aggregate of those sums is £15,837.55.
The question of whether the sums are taxable and should be grossed up was reserved for a separate judgment, to be decided after further submissions from the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Remedy judgment in respect of victimisation claims that the tribunal had previously found to be successful. Award is split across notice pay (£3,485.77), injury to feelings (£10,000) and interest (£2,351.78). Question of grossing up for tax to be addressed in a separate judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,838
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,486
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.