Case 3201117/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Lososovakaja v Randstad Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201117/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Lososovakaja
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant.
The claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between OSR Recruitment Services Ltd and Randstad Solutions Limited on 6 January 2019, and to payment of accrued holiday pay and unpaid wages before 7 January 2019. The judgment records that the Claimant had settled these claims, and related claims against OSR Recruitment Services Ltd, by COT3, then withdrew the claims by correspondence to the Tribunal. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment says the claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings and that the claims were settled by COT3, withdrawn, and therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the claim related to accrued holiday pay and that the claims were settled by COT3, withdrawn, and therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the claim related to unpaid wages and that the claims were settled by COT3, withdrawn, and therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.