Case 3201129/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Bonham v Phasor Electrical Limited (Creditors in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201129/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Bonham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 23 August 2019, Employment Judge Tobin heard evidence from the claimant, Miss C Bonham, and from Mr Baird on behalf of Phasor Electrical Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed in breach of section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment did not set out detailed findings beyond that conclusion. It made no discrimination or other additional findings, and it recorded no lay members. The respondent was ordered to pay compensation of £11,702.45, described as including both basic award and compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the award of £11,702.45 included both basic award and compensatory award, but the judgment did not split the figure between them. | Upheld | — | £11,702 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,702
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.