Case 3201138/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Waite v Engie FM Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201138/2019
- Decision date
- 29 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Waite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 29 July 2019, Employment Judge John Crosfill recorded that the Claimant's claims listed in paragraph 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 of the judgment were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The listed matters were claims relating to sums said to be due for the loss of personal possessions, back pay for 1 October 2017 to 16 April 2018, and annual leave pay.
The judgment states that all other claims were unaffected by this decision. It contains no merits findings, no legal analysis beyond the withdrawal order, and no remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim in respect of sums said to be due for the loss of personal possessions; pleaded as unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract. Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in respect of back pay for the period from 1 October 2017 to 16 April 2018; pleaded as unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract. Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for failure to pay annual leave, pleaded as unlawful deduction from wages, breach of contract, or under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.