Case 3201138/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Mason v Park Holidays UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201138/2020
- Decision date
- 26 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Ross Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Mason worked for Park Holidays (UK) Limited from 28 May 2012 to 10 March 2020 as Maintenance Supervisor at Steeple Bay Holiday Park. His contract said accommodation provided with the position could be withdrawn, but only after a period of consultation. After Maldon District Council refused planning permission in October 2019 for staff accommodation during the closed season, the tribunal found the respondent decided without consulting the claimant or any affected employee that only two staff could remain on site, and that the claimant was given only about two weeks to leave.
The tribunal accepted that the respondent knew the claimant's family circumstances, including his daughter’s significant learning disability and the time needed to arrange schooling and transport. It found there were no consultation documents, no job description for the proposed Siting Manager role, and no amended statement of terms. In February 2020 Mr Duffy discussed a transfer to Clacton, but on 28 February 2020 Mr Bush told the claimant he would not be doing a Siting Manager role and would instead be part of the siting team; the tribunal preferred the claimant’s account and found there was no misunderstanding.
The tribunal held that the respondent’s conduct from November 2019 to March 2020 breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, that the breach crystallised on or about 2 or 3 March 2020, and that the claimant did not affirm the contract. His resignation on 10 March 2020 was in response to that breach, so constructive unfair dismissal was upheld. The breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was also upheld, and the tribunal said the claimant was wrongfully dismissed, but the amount of damages and any section 38 Employment Act 2002 award were left to the remedy hearing listed for 16 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment described this as constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found a cumulative breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, no affirmation, and resignation in response to that breach. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was upheld as a breach of contract claim, but quantum was left to the remedy hearing. The tribunal also said the claimant was wrongfully dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavation Limited v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International
- Bournemouth University v Buckland
- Waltham Forest LBC v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
- United Bank v Akhtar
- R v British Coal ex p Price
- s.4 ERA 1996 / s.1(4)(f) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.