Case 3201140/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dilmaghani v HSBC Global Services (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201140/2019
- Decision date
- 3 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dilmaghani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties informed the Tribunal that a confidential settlement had been agreed, although it had not yet been communicated to ACAS. On that basis, Employment Judge Gardiner ordered that the case be dismissed upon withdrawal with effect from 24 October 2019 unless either party contacted the Tribunal before that date to object to judgment being entered.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this claim separately; it records that the parties had informed the Tribunal that a confidential settlement had been agreed but not yet communicated to ACAS, and the case was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out a separate merits determination for this claim; it records dismissal upon withdrawal after the parties said a confidential settlement had been agreed but not yet communicated to ACAS. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.