Case 3201140/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Remenar v Lemon Groundwork Solutions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201140/2024
- Decision date
- 19 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden- Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Remenar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a race discrimination complaint in relation to a dismissal on 13 October 2023. After neither party attended a preliminary hearing, the tribunal ordered the claimant to confirm whether he wished to continue with the claim and warned that strike out might be considered if he did not respond.
The tribunal found that correspondence had been sent to the claimant's stated email address and that he had not communicated with the tribunal since the order. It also noted that he had not provided a schedule of loss and had not responded to the respondent's application for strike out.
Taking account of Rule 38, the opportunities given to the claimant to make submissions, the overriding objective, delay, expense, and whether a fair trial remained possible, the tribunal decided to strike out the claim because it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant brought a race discrimination complaint in relation to dismissal, and that the claims were struck out under Rule 38(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.