Case 3201167/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Paige Parker v Savills Management Resources Ltd RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201167/2024
- Decision date
- 22 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Paige Parker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningPaige Parker was employed by Savills Management Resources Ltd as a Front of House Executive from 7 November 2022 until 2 February 2024. The case was described in the reasons as a disability discrimination claim. A preliminary hearing was listed for 31 October 2024 by CVP, and standard directions required the Respondent to prepare a draft list of issues and the Claimant to prepare a schedule of loss.
The Claimant told the tribunal on 5 August 2024 that she had moved to Manchester but did not provide a new address. Neither party attended the 31 October 2024 hearing. Employment Judge Drake accepted the Respondent representative's technical difficulty explanation, but noted that the Claimant had given no explanation for her non-attendance. The hearing was adjourned and the Claimant was ordered to show cause why the claims should not be struck out for non-attendance and to provide a statement explaining her absence by 28 November 2024.
The Claimant did not comply with that order. At the further preliminary hearing on 22 January 2025 she again did not attend, and had still not provided the tribunal with a phone number or new address. The Respondent asked the tribunal to dismiss the claim under Rule 47, submitting that the Claimant had already had three opportunities to engage with the proceedings and that a further hearing would likely lead to further expense and delay.
Employment Judge C Lewis decided, on balance, to dismiss the claim under Rule 47. The tribunal said that dismissal was proportionate, having taken account of the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment also noted that if the Claimant had an explanation for her non-attendance and wished to continue, she could apply for reconsideration under Rule 69 within 14 days of the decision being sent out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the Claimant failed to attend the hearing. The tribunal did not determine the disability discrimination allegations on their merits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective (Rule 3)
- reconsideration under Rule 69 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.