Case 3201172/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Greenham v Wernick Hire Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201172/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Greenham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge C Lewis, sitting alone at East London Employment Tribunal on 4 September 2019, recorded that the Claimant failed to attend the listed hearing and did not provide any evidence, medical or otherwise, to explain his absence despite the Tribunal's letter of 3 September 2019. The judgment then records that, when contacted by the Tribunal, the Claimant said he wished to withdraw his claim.
Following that withdrawal, the Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages and the breach of contract complaint. The Tribunal also dismissed the Respondent's employer's contract claim against the Claimant after the Respondent indicated that it would withdraw that claim as a result of the Claimant's withdrawal. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant after he failed to attend the hearing and told the tribunal that he wished to withdraw his claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Respondent's employer's contract claim against the Claimant was dismissed upon withdrawal after the Claimant withdrew his claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.