Case 3201198/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Martin v Glitters Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201198/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not attend. The claim was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 9 September 2019 before Employment Judge Gardiner, with the claimant appearing in person. The tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on each pleaded monetary claim.
The tribunal awarded £171 gross for an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. That sum related to three days in December 2018 when the tribunal found the claimant was ready, willing and able to work but was not paid.
The tribunal also awarded £2,230 gross for breach of contract because the respondent did not pay the three months' notice required by the claimant's employment contract. In addition, it awarded £332.31 gross under section 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for arrears of holiday pay, reflecting 5.83 days of holiday that had accrued but had not been taken by the end of the employment. The total awarded was £2,733.31 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as £171 gross for three days in December 2018 when the claimant was ready, willing and able to work but was not paid. | Upheld | — | £171 |
| Breach of contract | Award stated as £2,230 gross for the respondent's failure to pay three months' notice under the claimant's employment contract. | Upheld | — | £2,230 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as £332.31 gross under section 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 5.83 days of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,733
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.