Case 3201206/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Partho Roy v Howden Joinery Group plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201206/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Partho Roy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRegional Employment Judge Burgher struck out Mr Partho Roy's claims against Howden Joinery Limited at the East London Hearing Centre on 23 October 2024. The judgment records that the strike out was made pursuant to rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal rules.
The tribunal found that the Claimant had failed to comply with Employment Tribunal orders dated 26 July 2024 and 1 October 2024. It also found that he had not actively pursued the claim, including by failing to make representations about the Respondent's strike out application dated 6 September 2024, failing to respond to the Respondent's correspondence or provide a covert recording described as central to the allegations, and failing to attend the hearing or give a reason for non-attendance.
The tribunal considered that striking out the case was in accordance with the overriding objective and the interests of justice, including the need to deal with other cases. It recorded that prejudice to the Respondent from unpredictable case management and further costs outweighed prejudice to the Claimant, who had had an opportunity but failed to properly engage in the tribunal process. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as Sex Discrimination. The judgment itself does not set out particulars of the allegations; it records that the Claimant's claims were struck out under rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d). | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal rules
- overriding objective
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.