Case 3201207/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Musa v Roofoods Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201207/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Musa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held at East London Hearing Centre on 30 October 2023 before Employment Judge Jones. The judgment records that the hearing was converted to a public preliminary hearing under Rule 56 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel and a solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits, any award, or any breakdown of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment text does not state the underlying claim type; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing category of Race Discrimination. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 56 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37(1) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.