Case 3201213/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D West v The County Tyre Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201213/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrowclough Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D West
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at East London Hearing Centre on 20 September 2019 before Employment Judge Barrowclough. The Claimant, Mr D West, did not attend and was not represented; the Respondent was represented by Mr P Berry, Operations Manager.
The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because he failed to attend the Full Merits hearing without reasonable cause. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits of the claim.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no award figures or split between heads of loss. The decision was dated 30 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the Claimant failed to attend the Full Merits hearing without reasonable cause. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.