Case 3201219/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Dietsch v Essex Partnership University EPUT-S — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201219/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Dietsch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits determination is recorded in the extracted text, and no findings are given on liability, discrimination, dismissal, or any other substantive issue.
The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type or any remedy. It identifies the claimant as Miss K Dietsch and the respondent as Essex Partnership University EPUT-S, with Employment Judge Massarella giving judgment on 13 November 2019.
On the face of the extracted text, this was a procedural disposal only. There is no award, no legal test cited, and no further reasoning recorded in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive claim type, findings, or remedy are identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.