Case 3201219/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Shiju v B&M Retail Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201219/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Land, Mr M Rowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Shiju
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's breach of contract claim based on lack of procedures followed before dismissal because it did not have reasonable prospects of success.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's breach of contract claim that he was not given or paid in lieu of his full notice. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract based on lack of procedures followed before dismissal was struck out because it did not have reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract that the claimant was not given or paid in lieu of his full notice did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.