Mr H Singh v Glyn Hopkin Limited — 2019

Case reference: 3201228/2019
Decision date: 29 July 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge O’Brien
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr H Singh

Respondent

Glyn Hopkin Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment was entered by consent before Employment Judge O'Brien sitting alone on 29 July 2019. The tribunal recorded that Mr H Singh had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000.

The tribunal also recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday, and awarded £703.98 for that claim. The judgment directed the respondent to pay both sums by 8 August 2019. No separate legal test or reasons were set out in the short consent judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	Judgment by consent recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000.	Upheld	—	£3,000
Unlawful deduction from wages	Judgment by consent recorded unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday, with an award of £703.98.	Upheld	—	£704

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,704; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.