Case 3201230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Leacy v Building Crafts College Trading Ltd and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201230/2019
- Decision date
- 12 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr S. Leacy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 12 July 2019, Employment Judge Massarella recorded that the first respondent had accepted vicarious liability for any acts of discrimination found to have been done by the second and third respondents.
The judgment then dismissed the claims against Mr R. Conway and Ms R. Datta on withdrawal under Rule 52, Sch.1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The text provided does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying allegations and does not record any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52, Sch.1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.