Case 3201237/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hossain v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201237/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hossain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal claim brought under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It stated that the claimant complained of unfair dismissal but had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
The tribunal referred to section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which requires not less than two years' service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. It found that the claimant was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal proceedings and had not given an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out.
The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other claims were unaffected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's other claims are unaffected by this judgment, so only the unfair dismissal complaint is treated as adjudicated here. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.