Case 3201246/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Finnigan v Landmark Group (UK) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201246/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D. Finnigan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 5 August 2019 at the East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Massarella under Rule 21. The respondent did not appear and did not present an ET3 response. The tribunal also amended the respondent’s name to Landmark Group (UK) Ltd.
Mr Finnigan’s claim of unauthorised deduction from wages, identified in the judgment as holiday pay, was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear it. His breach of contract claim, identified as notice pay, was also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded in the absence of an ET3 response. The tribunal ordered Landmark Group (UK) Ltd to pay Mr Finnigan the gross sum of £3,810.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages (holiday pay). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim for breach of contract (notice pay). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The respondent did not present an ET3 response to the statutory redundancy payment claim, so the claim succeeded and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,810. | Upheld | — | £3,810 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,810
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.