Case 3201252/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Shrigley v Messiah Corporation Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201252/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Shrigley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend or be represented at the telephone hearing. The tribunal noted that the respondent had been informed that Mr O’Sullivan, the claimant’s line manager, would not attend, but no postponement application was made. The Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and heard oral evidence from the claimant on oath.
The claim for breach of contract, limited to failure to pay notice pay, succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,253.46 gross, said to be the amount of one week’s gross wages and benefits. The judgment records that tax and National Insurance could be deducted, with the net sum anticipated to be £1,000.
The claim for unpaid holiday also succeeded. The tribunal awarded one week’s holiday pay in the same gross amount of £1,253.46, again subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance and with the net amount anticipated to be £1,000. The judgment states the grand total payable within 21 days was £2,506.92 gross, or £2,000 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned failure to pay notice pay. The tribunal ordered one week’s gross wages and benefits, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
| Holiday pay | Claim concerned unpaid holiday. The tribunal awarded one week’s holiday pay in the same gross amount, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,507
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.