Case 3201270/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jayne Jones Second Claimant: Mr Godfrey Paul Jones v Businesscom Europe Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201270/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jayne Jones Second Claimant: Mr Godfrey Paul Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBusinesscom Europe Limited failed to enter a response to the claimants' claims. Employment Judge Burgher therefore entered judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 in favour of Mrs Jayne Jones and Mr Godfrey Paul Jones on their holiday pay and redundancy claims, and the hearing listed for 9 September 2019 was cancelled.
The order records an award to Mrs Jayne Jones of £1,584.60 for accrued holiday pay and £11,488.35 for redundancy pay, and the same amounts to Mr Godfrey Paul Jones. The text also states a total of £13,072.35 for each claimant, but the component figures as extracted do not add up to that total; the figures are reproduced as stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mrs Jayne Jones was awarded £11,488.35 for redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £11,488 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs Jayne Jones was awarded £1,584.60 for accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,585 |
| Holiday pay | Mr Godfrey Paul Jones was awarded £1,584.60 for accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,585 |
| Redundancy | Mr Godfrey Paul Jones was awarded £11,488.35 for redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £11,488 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,145
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.