Case 3201279/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Scott v Assisi Veterinary Group Limited T/A Tiptree Vets — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201279/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Scott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Scott’s claim against Assisi Veterinary Group Limited T/A Tiptree Vets was heard by Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre on 16 August 2019. The judgment records that the claim was brought outside the appropriate time limit under section 123(1)(a) of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal decided not to exercise its discretion to allow the claim to proceed under section 123(1)(b). As a result, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s complaints and the claim was struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was brought outside the appropriate time limit under section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and that discretion was not exercised under section 123(1)(b). It does not identify the protected characteristic or substantive allegation in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.