Case 3201285/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Simone Torri v Ay Pub Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201285/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Simone Torri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Housego heard the case at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 7 December 2021. The claimant, Simone Torri, appeared in person and the respondent, Ay Pub Ltd, was represented by its director, Ahmet Mehkli. The judgment records that the claimant was not provided with a contract of employment and that the respondent was ordered to pay £400, described in the reasons as two weeks' pay, which the statute says is the amount to be ordered.
The reasons state that Mr Mekhli said Mr Torri had not transferred to the respondent because he had left the pub before the business was taken over, so a new contract should have been issued when he was taken on again on 5 March 2020, but had not been. On that basis, the tribunal made the order for £400 in respect of the absence of a contract.
The remaining claims were dismissed. The reasons identify them as a claim for a week in hand and a claim for deduction from wages for rent for a room at the pub. Both were dismissed for want of evidence, with the tribunal noting that there was only assertion. The reasons also record that Mr Torri agreed he was hourly paid and on a zero hours contract, and that it was inherently unlikely he would have been earning £450 per week, which he said he had earned with the previous owners.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not label the underlying statutory cause of action, but it records that the claimant was not provided with a contract of employment and awards two weeks' pay, described as the statutory amount. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described in the reasons as a claim for a 'week in hand'; dismissed for want of evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described in the reasons as a deduction from wages claim for rent for a room at the pub; dismissed for want of evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.