Case 3201288/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Clarence Paulraj v Ravis (Basildon) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201288/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Clarence Paulraj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Clarence Paulraj’s case was heard by Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre by telephone on 18 August 2020. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its director, Mr S Gandu.
The judgment records that the claimant’s claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. No findings on the merits are set out in the extracted text, and no monetary remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The claim type is taken from the case listing, as the judgment text itself does not specify the underlying labels. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The claim type is taken from the case listing, as the judgment text itself does not specify the underlying labels. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.