Case 3201291/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sreedharan v Toomey Motor Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201291/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Sreedharan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge E Gordon Walker sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre on 20 March 2024. The claimant, Mr S Sreedharan, represented himself and the respondent, Toomey Motor Group Limited, was represented by counsel. The judgment records a respondent counterclaim and an unlawful deduction from wages claim by the claimant.
The Tribunal dismissed the respondent's counterclaim on jurisdictional grounds. It said it did not have jurisdiction to hear the counterclaim because the claimant had not brought a breach of contract claim, referring to the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.
On the claimant's wages claim, the Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's July 2023 payslip in the gross sum of £167.30. It also found that all other claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were not well-founded and dismissed them. The judgment does not record any further monetary award beyond the £167.30 identified for the July 2023 deduction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's July 2023 payslip in the gross sum of £167.30. The judgment also states that all other claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £167 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed because the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the counterclaim, as the claimant had not brought a breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £167
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.