Case 3201307/2022 · Employment Tribunal
N Allende v LRB Electrical & Building Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201307/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Allende
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a warning letter dated 21 October 2022 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with Rule 47 and Rule 37(d), had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 03 October 2022, had not actively pursued the claim, and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing because the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Jones struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 12 January 2023 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance with Rule 47 and Rule 37(d), non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 03 October 2022, lack of active pursuit, and because a fair hearing was no longer possible. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.