Case 3201313/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Emma Riddle v Medi-Science International Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201313/2024
- Decision date
- 18 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Povey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Emma Riddle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London East Employment Tribunal on 19 June 2024. The Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claim succeeded. The written record states that the Respondent must pay the Claimant £1,500 in respect of unpaid wages.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing on 18 November 2024. No written reasons were provided because none were requested at the hearing and no written request was made within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim succeeds and the Respondent must pay £1,500 in respect of unpaid wages. The decision was made under rule 21 after no valid response was presented on time. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.