Case 3201314/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MH Rahman v Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201314/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- By Telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MH Rahman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment of Employment Judge JM Wade, heard by telephone on 11 January 2023. The claimant was Mr MH Rahman and the respondent was the Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's Equality Act allegations of section 15 discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal. No findings on the substantive merits of those allegations were made in the judgment.
The judgment also states that case number 3201315/2022 was dismissed as a duplicate, and that the remaining claims in 3201314/2022 were to continue. No remedy was awarded or recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Employment Judge recorded that the Claimant's Equality Act allegations of section 15 discrimination in these proceedings were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Case number 3201315/2022 was dismissed as a duplicate; the remaining claims in 3201314/2022 continued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.