Case 3201320/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Freedman v Taylor Surveyors Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201320/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Members
- Venue
- East London Tribunal Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Mr M Wood
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs P Freedman
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded against Taylor Surveyors Ltd but was dismissed against Elliot Taylor. It also directed that no deduction should be made from any award for contributory fault, Polkey, or under the ACAS Code of Conduct on grievance and disciplinary procedures. The judgment did not record any final remedy figures because the matter was to proceed to a remedy hearing.
The Claimant's indirect sex discrimination claim under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed against both Respondents. The judgment does not set out a separate remedy for that claim because liability was not established.
The Claimant's flexible working claim under sections 80G and 80H of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded against the First Respondent. The Tribunal declared that the Respondent had failed to deal with the Claimant's application for flexible working dated 8 February 2023 in a reasonable manner under section 80G(1)(a). The claim in respect of failure to provide written payslips was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal succeeded against the First Respondent and was dismissed against the Second Respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claim was for indirect sex discrimination under s.19 Equality Act 2010 and was dismissed against both Respondents. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Flexible working | The claim under s.80G and s.80H ERA 1996 succeeded against the First Respondent. The Tribunal declared that the Respondent failed to deal with the Claimant's flexible working application dated 8 February 2023 in a reasonable manner under s.80G(1)(a). | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The claim in respect of failure to provide written payslips was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- s.80G(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- contributory fault
- Polkey
- ACAS Code of Conduct on grievance and disciplinary procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.