Case 3201326/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Abbeys Care Support & Training Ltd and others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201326/2023
- Decision date
- 20 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Misra K.C.
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Misra K.C. on 20 September 2024. The Claimant, Ms Mary Tennyson, appeared in person and the Respondents were represented by Mr L. Baker of Avensure Limited.
The tribunal refused the Respondent's application dated 12 September 2024 to strike out the claim under rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure for alleged non-compliance. The judgment also recorded that the Second to Fourth Respondents had permission to rely on the ET3 form filed by the First Respondent and were not required to file any further ET3 forms.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application dated 12 September 2024 to strike out the claim under rule 37(1)(c) for alleged non-compliance was refused at a preliminary hearing. This is an interlocutory application, not a substantive tribunal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.