Case 3201335/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Dubravec v Marvo Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201335/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Dubravec
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Dubravec brought a single complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for £1,120. The respondent presented a late response, which was rejected by a Legal Officer on 27 September 2023 because it had been submitted out of time without an application to extend time. The respondent did not seek reconsideration of that decision.
Neither party attended the hearing on 30 October 2023. Employment Judge Klimov considered whether to dismiss the claim for non-attendance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, but decided not to do so. The tribunal instead determined the claim without a hearing under Rule 21 and entered judgment for the claimant.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period between 23 April 2023 and 2 May 2023. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,120, being the gross sum deducted, and recorded that the claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period between 23 April 2023 and 2 May 2023 and ordered payment of the gross deducted sum. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,120
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 ET Rules
- Rule 21 ET Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.